From Inception to Deception with Q & A

 

someone pointed out that i missed to mention the important "points" so i had to modify this entry....

note: this entry will and might upset you.... you've been warned...

=========================================================

a note for myself
to remind me to always remain humble
and to never hold grudges
blog maia, regulai maia

2006	- 3 major "pasimuno" planned putting up the "thing". but needed 2 fillers. a corporation  needs atleast 5 people to be qualified as a corporation. so (2) brought her friend and (3) brought her friend.i didnt bring any (my mistake, i was outnumbered)
Dec 2006	- first project
Feb 2007	- (1)  left for US
May 2007	- official and legal and registered. (1) + (2) + (3) are all doing the "thing" part time, as previously planned and decided.
2007	- (2) quits day job/became full time. (1) + (3) still working  part-time for the "thing"
Mar 2008	- (3) quits day job/became full time. (1) still part-time
Oct 2008	- (1) booted out. reason: not in the same location as (2) & (3). can't do full time. need full time peeps coz things are getting hairy. suggestions: - suggestion: meeting before deciding anything. dont surprise attack coz its an unfair treatment. - suggestion: hire people if things are already getting too hairy so nobody needs to quit day jobs. - suggestion: make outline for clear delegation of tasks  for equal distribution - suggestion: AND always keep "people" in the loop about projects so task distribution is easier ... don't ignore (1)'s emails.... question: why follow ups/inquiries/balikbayan projects gets ignored. answer: plan of booting out is in progress
2010	- hired people (finally) -  (3)  is now in the US
	- question: (3) is now in the US  like (1).  will  (3) be booted out  why? answer: ofcourse not. politics. - question: but, but, the reason they kicked out (1) is because "she can't be physically there". that's not fair.  answer:  i'd like to think they were misguided by money. a nightmare that all honest business partners had to go through. - question: did (1) helped in the foundation? is  (1) the most well-travelled & well experienced in organizing/managing projects at that time. answer: yes and yes - question: when did (1) started organizing "projects"? answer: 2004 for pexersLibotPinas - question: did (1) at one point registered a travel agency? what happened? answer: yes, it's called traveholics network, that was back in 2004....makati denied me of a business permit because travel business is saturated in makati....i concentrated on making tour packages and organizing tours for free instead... - question: (1)'s credentials? answers: TLRC's how to set up your own "travel agency" and 2nd course on "airline booking, reservation, creating tour packages" - question: your contribution? answer: first niche market, set of clients, first set of contacts, first set logistics, tour packages, initial business strategy...basically the whole initial foundation...plus the actual business operation for two years... - question: so why booted out? answer: the "thing" is becoming famous, it's  up and running, it's  stable.  they got what  they needed from (1) so they don't have use for (1) anymore. oh. and (1) is in d US, they say (1) abandoned them. - question: abandoned? emails/chats/video conference don't count? answer: apparently, no. have to be physically there. - question: (2) & (3) changed their mindsand offered (1) 5% of the "thing", right? (1) should be thankful for that. answer: (1) felt insulted...imagine bill gates being kicked out from microsoft and they told him he can come back but they'll give him just 5% instead.... plus after all the "drama" that transpired, joining them again will be awkward. plus it would be suicide. - question: why do they have to remove (1)? cant they just have (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) plus 2 fillers? answer: good question. because too many people will have to share the pie? because (1) is in the US and they don't like it that (1) is getting both worlds (US & owning a business).  i dont know. - question: does (1) knows how much the "thing" is earning answer: no. never saw the books. never tried to because i trusted them. BIG mistake. they're, im sorry for lack of better word, scumbags. - question: did (1) get anything after 2 years as an owner? like buy out? salary? answer: none. nada. zilch. just heartaches. - question: you think they'll get mad when they see this? answer: yes. as far as they're concerned they did nothing wrong. for them, just telling someone by email that you just got the sack and they don't need you anymore without a warning, a meeting and voting is absolutely the correct and most humane thing to do.  and as far as they're concerned (1) is the bad guy because (1) shouldn't let anyone know about what happened and should never complain about their decision. plus it's bad publicity for them. but i like exercising my freedom of speech. so, im sorry travelfactor the world has to know. - question: bad publicity. so why does (1) still had to post this  answer: freedom of speech. blog maia, regulai maia. i'm sure "they" say things about (1) too. plus (1) is not mentioning names. - question: ur plan?  answer: no comment. i like to surprise people - question: does (1) hate 2 & 3?  answer: nah. just indifferent. - question: how about (4) & (5), does (1) hate them?  answer: it's mainly all (2) & (3)'s fault. im sure (4) didn't brain-washed them to kick (1) out. i hope. - question: "some" people say (1) talks a lot and "they'" are quiet.. .any comment? answer: "they" talk a lot about this too but they just hide it from (1)...(1) makes sure she's not backstabbing them by  making "posts"  viewable to not just some but everyone.... - question: and that you are bitter and over reacting.. answer: imagine yourself being betrayed by someone you trust then come back to me and tell me if i am indeed over reacting.... - question: what will (1) do if (1) sees (2) & (3) & (4) face to face? answer: smile and give them a friendly nod and continue walking.... i know how to be civil... but i cant never be friends with cheaters and backstabbers....

 

(1) = me
(2) = owner 2
(3) = owner 3
(4) = new owner
"thing" = travelfactor
first project = 1st surfvivor